- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 31 July 2023
- Bench
- Battu Devanand
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 24919/2016
Judgment
ORDER On 21.07.2023, as there was no representation for the petitioner, this case is posted 'for dismissal' today.
¶2Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute this case.
¶3Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
¶4No costs.
31.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To
1.The Principal Secretary to the Government, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai-600 015.
3.The Joint Secretary to the Government, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai-600 009.
BATTU DEVANAND, J. abr
4.The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai.
5.The Accountant General (Accounts & Entitlements), Teynampet, Chennai-600 018.
6.The District Treasury Officer, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. Dated : 31.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND and W.M.P.(MD) No.18016 of 2016 S.Govindarajan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary to the Government, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai-600 015. 3.The Joint Secretary to the Government, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai-600 009. 4.The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai. 5.The Accountant General (Accounts & Entitlements), Teynampet, Chennai-600 018. 6.The District Treasury Officer, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceeding in Letter No.22535/Pay Cell/2015-1 dated 18.05.2015 passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same and consequently direct Respondents 1 to 3 to extend the benefits of G.O.Ms.No.330 [Finance (Pay Cell) Department] dated 26.08.2010 and G.O.Ms.No.318 [Finance (Pay Cell) Department] dated 22.07.2013 to the petitioner who retired on prior to 12.12.2007 from the date of implementation of the Pay Commission recommendation and to settle all the attendant benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.A.P.Muthu Pandian For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.