R.Kanagaraj v. The State of Tamil Nadu

ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments happened after filing this writ petition, nothing requires for adjudication in the present writ petition.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3In view of the above factual position, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶4No costs.

¶5Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

01.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To

1.The Director, State of Tamilnadu, Department of School Education, Chennai-600 006.

2.The District Educational Officer, O/o. The District Educational Office, Tirunelveli District. W.P.(MD)oNo.24977oofo2016 BATTUoDEVANAND,oJ. abr W.P.(MD)oNo.24977oofo2016 Datedo:o01.09.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND and W.M.P.(MD) No.18068 of 2016 R.Kanagaraj .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep., by its Director, Department of School Education, Chennai-600 006. 2.The Accountant General, Accounts and Entitlement, Nandanam, Chennai-600 018. 3.The District Educational Officer, O/o. The District Educational Office, Tirunelveli District. 4.Hindu Nadar Uravinmurai Committee Higher Secondary School, Rep., by its Secretary, Ariyanayakipuram, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 5.N.Kopperundevi .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Declaration to declare the promotion of Respondent No.5 as P.G.Assistant (History) in the 4th Respondent School as illegal and consequently direct Respondent No.2 not to disburse the service and other monetary benefits of Respondent No.5. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Karthik For RR1 & 3 : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate For R2 : Mr.P.Gunasekaran For R4 : Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram For R5 : Mr.C.Vakeeswaran