M.Pandiaraj, S/O. Mariappan, v. The District Collector,

ORDER When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 05.06.2023, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition was directed to be listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

06.06.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The District Collector,

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer,

¶3The Thasildar, Tharamgampatty, Karur District.

¶4The Village Administrative Officer, Thevarmalai, Karur District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

06.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI M.Pandiaraj ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Collector, 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, 3. The Thasildar, Tharamgampatty, Karur District. 4. The Village Administrative Officer, Thevarmalai, Karur District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to dispose of the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A4/3020/2010, dated 20.06.2012. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, Government Advocate