R.Subramanian v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner is present. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the first to third respondents would submit that the petitioner is dead and his family has been accorded with the family pension. Page No. 2 of 4

¶2In view of the above, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

16.10.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Index: Yes/ No jen To

1.The Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, The Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Department and Chief Engineer (General), Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

3.The Commissioner of Technical Education (i/c), Directorate of Technical Education, Chennai – 25.

4.The Principal Accountant General (Accounts and Entitlements), 361, Annasalai, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018. Page No. 3 of 4

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. jen

16.10.2023 Page No. 4 of 4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN R.Subramanian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Department and Chief Engineer (General), Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 3.The Commissioner of Technical Education (i/c), Directorate of Technical Education, Chennai – 25. 4.The Principal Accountant General (Accounts and Entitlements), 361, Annasalai, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018. ... Respondents Page No. 1 of 4 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Letter No.31935/C1/2014-2, dated 15.06.2015 on the file of the first respondent and the consequential communication in Letter No.S.5(2)/38549/2015, dated 27.01.2016 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Draughting Officer and Senior Draughting Officer with re-fixation of pension within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Karthik for M/s.T.Lajapathi Roy & Associates For R1 to R3 : Mr.T.Amjadkhan Government Advocate For R4 : No appearance *****