- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 October 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 2895/2016
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner has availed a loan from the first respondent. Since he failed to pay the due amount, an auction notice was issued by the first respondent on 29.01.2016 and the same is under challenge in this writ petition.
¶2Today, when the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that pending this writ petition, the petitioner has settled the entire due amount to the first respondent and therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition.
¶3Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
06.10.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To
¶1The Secretary, The Kanyakumari District, Government Officer and Public Services Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., No.Y-299, Gandhi Nagar, N.G.O.Colony, Kottar, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
¶2The Co-operative Sub Registrar, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy
¶3The Deputy Registrar, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli.
06.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.2556 of 2016 S.Gopalan ... Petitioner versus 1. The Secretary, The Kanyakumari District, Government Officer and Public Services Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., No.Y-299, Gandhi Nagar, N.G.O.Colony, Kottar, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2. The Co-operative Sub Registrar, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 3. The Deputy Registrar, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent herein dated 29.01.2016 regarding the auction dated 11.02.2016 published in Dhina Malar Daily News Paper and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents not to disturb the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's house. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Selvakumaran For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.