I. Arumugam, S/O.Ayyakannu v. The Commissioner

O R D E R Mr.R.Alagumani, learned counsel for the petitioner on record submits that in view of the subsequent developments after filing this Writ Petition, this Writ Petition has become infructuous.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶4No costs.

¶5Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

26.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No RM To The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Arinagar Anna Maligai, Tallakulam, Madurai – 625 002.

BATTU DEVANAND, J. RM W.P.(MD)No.3496 of 2016

26.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.3496 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.3095 of 2016 I.Arumugam ...Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Arinagar Anna Maligai, Tallakulam, Madurai – 625 002. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to pay the with held time barred arrears amount Rs.53,193/- from the petitioner's Gratuity, consequently to pay the VI Pay Commission arrears and consequential benefits to the petitioner by considering the representation dated 04.01.2016 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani For Respondent : Mr.K.K.Kannan