M.Vijayalakshmi v. The District Collector

O R D E R On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by subsequent events. By taking note of the same, W.P.(MD).No.3631 of 2016 is dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs.

23.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No ssb To

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Tahsildar, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Sub-Registrar, Thiruthangal Sub-Registrar Office, Thiruthangal, Virudhunagar District.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. ssb

23.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :23.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY M.Vijayalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Tahsildar, Virudhunagar Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Sub-Registrar, Thiruthangal Sub-Registrar Office, Thiruthangal, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the second respondent herein made in Na.Ka.Aa3/11749/2015 Tha.Pa.No.1169/15 dated 30.12.2015 and the consecutive order of the third respondent herein made in Ka.Thi.Mu.No.XXX dated 27.01.2016 and to quash the same as illegal and direct the respondents to pass necessary orders upon the petitioner's application within a stipulated time. For Petitioner :Mr.S.Balakarthick For Respondents :Mrs.D.Farjan Ghoshin Special Government Pleader