VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M.C.Shanmugaiah v. The Additional Principal

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 March 2023
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 4111/2016

Judgment

O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been instructed to withdraw the writ petition. He has made an endorsement for the said purpose. By taking note of the same, W.P.(MD).No.4111 of 2016 is dismissed as withdrawn without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.(MD).No.3680 of 2016 is closed.

08.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sbn To

1.The Additional Principal Secretary, Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Ezhilagam, Chennai.

2.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

3.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. W.P.(Mi)No.4111oofo2016 SENTHILKUMARoRAMAMOORTHY,oJ. sbn W.P.(MD)No.4111oofo2016 and W.M.P.(MD).No.3680oofo2016

08.03.2023 Pageo4oofo4

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :08.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.(MD).No.3680 of 2016 M.C.Shanmugaiah ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Additional Principal Secretary, Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Ezhilagam, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings in Mo.Mu.C(3) 33014/2009 dated 06.12.2010 and the consequential impugned order passed by the first respondent in the appeal preferred by the petitioner in Appeal No.4 of 2011 in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.Vani.5(1)/2334/2011 dated 08.06.2015, quash the both as illegal and consequently direct the second respondent to grant Am Licence to the petitioner for his self protection. For Petitioner :Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu For Respondents :Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader for R1, R2 & R4 :Mr.R.Sivakumar for R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.