- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 4396/2016
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition is filed as against the order dated 01.04.2015 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukkottai, cancelling the order of free assignment patta made in favour of the petitioner in the year 2013 for the land in S.No.78/31.
¶2With regard to the lands in Survey Nos.78/25 to 78/31 at Pallimadam Village, Tiruchuzhi Taluk, free assignment patta was given to various persons. At that time, the petitioner and her husband have also been granted free assignment of patta for the lands in Survey Nos.78/31 & 78/30 respectively. On the field verification and also on the objection raised by the villagers, the Tahsildar, Tiruchuzhi Taluk, Virudhunagar District, has conducted an enquiry and submitted a report to the Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District. Thereafter, based on the report of the Tahsildar, Tiruchuzhi Taluk, Virudhunagar District and also based on the filed inspection report that no construction has been made in the land in Survey No. 78/31, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District, by order dated 01.04.2015, has cancelled free assignment patta issued in favour of the petitioner in Survey No.78/31. Challenging the same, the present writ petition has been filed.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the lands in Survey Nos.78/30 and 78/31 are natham lands and the petitioner and her husband were in occupation of that property. Considering their occupation, free assignment patta has been issued in favour of the petitioner and her husband. The petitioner has also constructed house in the said lands and therefore, it is not proper to cancel the patta after two years.
¶4The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submits that by misrepresentation, free assignment patta has been issued to the petitioner as well as to her husband wrongly. On the objection raised by the villagers, an enquiry was conducted and based on the report of the Tashildar, Tiruchuzhi Taluk, this impugned order came to be passed. The learned Additional Government Pleader has also relied on Clause 7(a) of the assignment dated 27.12.2013, wherein, it has been specifically stated that if patta has been obtained by fraud or misrepresentation, patta would be cancelled without any due notice to the parties.
¶5This Court has considered the rival submissions.
¶6The petitioner got patta for the land in Survey No.78/31 by way of free assignment. The free assignment patta was given to both the petitioner as well as to her husband. On the field verification, the Tahsildar, Tiruchuzhi Taluk, has filed a report that there is no building in Survey No.78/31. Further, by considering the fact that the petitioner's husband has also obtained free assignment patta, the impugned order has been passed. Therefore, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the order dated 01.04.2015, passed by the first respondent.
¶7Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
12.10.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To
¶1The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukkottai Sub Division, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District.
¶2The Tahsildar, Tiruchuzhi Taluk, Virudhunagar District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy
12.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD)No.3927 of 2016 P.Pandilakshmi ... Petitioner versus 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukkottai Sub Division, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District. 2. The Tahsildar, Tiruchuzhi Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 3. R.Ramu ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.AA3/3300/2014 dated 01.04.2015 and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balamurugan For R1 and R2 : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.S.J.Chakkaravarthi
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.