Ponnuthai v. The District Collector,

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) Learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that during the pendency of the Writ Petition a civil suit was instituted, which was decreed in favour of the petitioner.

¶2That being the factum, no further adjudication is necessary. Therefore, the Writ Petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

(S.M.S., J.) & (V.L.N., J.)

01.11.2023

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No SJ To

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai Sub Division, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Tahsildar, Kariapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. SJ

01.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.(MD) No.414 of 2016 Ponnuthai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai Sub Division, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Tahsildar, Kariapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 4.Udayakumar ...Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of 3rd respondent dated 05.01.2016 and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional, consequently forbear the respondents from interfering with peaceful enjoyment of petitioner over old S.No.46, new S.No.100/10 situated at ChittuMoondradaippu Village, Kariapatti Taluk, Virudhunagar District. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balamurugan For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.J.Barathan for R4