VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Dinesh v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 October 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 17476/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 12/10/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN Dinesh ... Petitioner / Accused No.3 Vs State rep by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul District, (Crime No.39/2022.) ... Respondent / Complainant

For Petitioner : M/s.Roniga.M.P, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi,

Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.39/2022 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.3, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 120(b), 406 and 420 of I.P.C, in Crime No.39 of 2022 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The ID card has been produced by the learned counsel for the petitioner to show that the petitioner is working in a private company.

¶3By the order dated 09.08.2023, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor was required to verify the same.

¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that from 2019, the petitioner was working in a private company in Bangalore and now settled in the present address. According to him, the petitioner was involved in the collection of money. Further, Rs.6,50,00,000/- is involved in this matter. Apart from that, the petitioner received money from various persons through the mobile application (i.e) Google Pay. After October 2022, he is working in Telecomoone Teleservices India private limited in Bengalore.

¶5Considering the fact that the petitioner has received money through Google Pay application from various persons, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, since more than Rs.6,50,00,000/- is involved in this matter. Therefore, the earlier petition filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.

6.A report has been called for from the trial Court stating that now the final report filed by the respondent police and taken cognizance in C.C.No.678 of 2023. The petitioner can very well move the above said trial Court seeking bail.

7.With the above said liberty, this criminal original petition stands dismissed.

sd/-

12/10/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/11/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. )

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. TM To

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul.

2.Do through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul District.

3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul District.

4.The Officer Incharge, District Prison, Dindigul.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17476 of 2023 Date :12/10/2023 ED/JGB/SAR- (03/11/2023) 4P / 6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.