R.M.Karthikeyan, v. The Superintendent of Police,

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to remove the petitioner's name from the History Sheet maintain by the third respondent.

2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh petition by challenging the present order passed by the respondent. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent has no objection to withdraw this petition.

4.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition by challenging the present order passed by the respondents. No costs.

23.08.2023 Index : Internet : gns To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dinidgul District, Dindigul.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station, Dindigul District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P. DHANABAL

,J.

gns

23.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.08.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL R.M.Karthikeyan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dinidgul District, Dindigul. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to remove the petitioner's name from the History Sheet maintain by the third respondent. For Petitioner : Mrs.M.Anbarasi For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor