VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Smt.M.Sulthana Laila, v. The Divisional Railway Manager

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
1 December 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 19592/2018

Judgment

ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

01.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb To

1.The Divisional Railway Manager (Commercial) Southern Railway Division, Tiruchirapalli.

2.The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railway Division, Divisional Office, Commercial Branch, Tiruchirapalli.

3.The General Manager, Head Quarters Office, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai-600 003.

4.The Secretary, Railway Board, Ministry of Railway, Railway Bhavan, New Delhi. Dated : 01.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P(MD).Nos.17377 and 17378 of 2018 M.Sulthana Laila .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Divisional Railway Manager (Commercial) Southern Railway Division, Tiruchirapalli. 2.The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railway Division, Divisional Office, Commercial Branch, Tiruchirapalli. 3.The General Manager, Head Quarters Office, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai-600 003. 4.The Secretary, Railway Board, Ministry of Railway, Railway Bhavan, New Delhi. .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to tender notification bearing Notice No.12- TPJ/Division-SMU/2018 dated 30.07.2018 of the first respondent herein and quash the same in respect of catering stall No.S1 at Tiruchirappalli under SMU/OBC-W, Catering Stall No.S4 at Thanjavur under SMU(MIN) and Catering Stall S13 at Thanjavur under SMU(OBC). For Petitioner : Mr.C.Mahadevan For Respondents : Mr.K.R.Laxman

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.