K.M.A.Natarajan, S/O.Appakalai v. The Inspector General of

ORDER This writ petition has been filed for a writ of mandamus for a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.03.2016.

2.When the writ petition has been taken up for hearing the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is no more and the legal heirs of the petitioner are not interested to proceed with the case and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. No costs.

3.In view of the above submission and endorsement, this writ petition is closed. No costs.

20.06.2023 dsk To

1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome Highroad, Chennai – 28.

2.The Registrar, (Registration Department), Dindigul Registration District, Dindigul.

3.The Sub-Registrar, Vedasandur, Dindigul District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk

20.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI KMA.Natarajan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome Highroad, Chennai – 28. 2.The Registrar, (Registration Department), Dindigul Registration District, Dindigul. 3.The Sub-Registrar, Vedasandur, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.03.2016 and consequently directing the 1st respondent to take appropriate action against the 3rd respondent officials and pay the compensation to the petitioner. For petitioner : Mr.R.Suriyanarayanan For Respondents : Mr.PT.Thiraviam Government Advocate