M.Lourdu Josephine, v. The Director of School

ORDER This writ petition is filed challenging the promotion Order.

¶2Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that pending writ petition the petitioner has attained superannuation and retired from service. The submissions are recorded.

¶3In view of the aforesaid submissions, nothing survives for adjudication. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index : Yes / No

05.04.2023 Internet : Yes

ksa To

¶1The Director of School Education (Higher Secondary), O/o. the Directorate of School Education, College Road, Chennai – 6.

¶2The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

¶3The Chief Educational Officer, O/o.the Chief Educational office, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

¶4U.V.Aadavallan, Headmaster (In-Charge), Government Higher Secondary School, R.Kavanoor, Ramanathapuram District. S.SRIMATHY, J ksa W.P.(MD)No. 6954 of 2016

05.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No. 6954 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.5951 & 7801 of 2016 M.Lourdu Josephine ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Director of School Education (Higher Secondary), O/o. the Directorate of School Education, College Road, Chennai – 6. 2. The District Collector, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 3. The Chief Educational Officer, O/o.the Chief Educational office, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 4. U.V.Aadavallan, Headmaster (In-Charge), Government Higher Secondary School, R.Kavanoor, Ramanathapuram District. .... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No. 1994/Aa1/2016 dated 31.03.2016 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar, for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Mr.V.Omprakash Government Advocate