- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 March 2023
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 707/2016
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition is filed by the President of the village panchayat, namely; Unniyur Village Panchayat.
¶2The contention of the petitioner is that the 4th respondent being BDO is interfering in the functions of the President. The President being a elected member, he has certain powers and responsibilities. But, the 4th respondent is interfering and it is beyond the power of the BDO. This writ petition was filed in the year 2016. The petitioner wants to determine his power as a President of the Village panchayat in this writ petition.
¶3Due to efflux of time the petitioner is not a President now. The 4th respondent has also retired from service. Therefore, question raised in this writ petition is left open.
¶4Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index : Yes / No
30.03.2023 Internet : Yes
ksa To
1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.
2.The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Trichy.
3.The Block Development Officer,(Village Panchayaths) Thottiyam, Trichy District
S.SRIMATHY, J ksa W.P.(MD)No. 707 of 2016
30.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No.707 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos. 556 and 3581 of 2016 V.Manickavachagam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Trichy. 3.The Block Development Officer,(Village Panchayaths) Thottiyam, Trichy District. 4.N.Kannan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in persuant to the impugned order in Na.Ka.Aa.5/551/2015 dated 08.12.2015 and the consequential order in Na.Ka.Aa.5/551/2015 dated 29.12.2015 passed by the 3rd Respondent and quash the same and directing the 1st Respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 02.01.2016 and take appropriate action against the 4th Respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karthikeya Venkitachalapathy For Respondent : Mr.M.Lingadurai, Special Government Pleader for R-1 to R-3 Mr.M.RajaRajan for R-4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.