- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 23 March 2023
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 7129/2016
Judgment
ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for by the petitioner is infructuous.
¶2In view of the aforesaid submission and due to efflux of time, the claim of the petitioner cannot be entertained after 6 years were lapsed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index : Yes / No
23.03.2023 Internet : Yes
ksa To
1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Chairman, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.
3.The Deputy Secretary, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.
4.The Controller of Examinations, Chennai – 600 003.
S.SRIMATHY, J ksa W.P.(MD)No. 7129 of 2016
23.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No.7129 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD) No.6042 and 6043 of 2016 K.Paunraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Chairman, Chennai – 600 003. 3.The Deputy Secretary, Chennai – 600 003. 4.The Controller of Examinations, Chennai – 600 003. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 3rd respondent in his proceedings in Memo No.2461/DTD-R/2016, dated 28.03.2016 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to change the date of examination for Code No.176 and 168 in the Notification No.4/2016 issued by the 4th respondent for the Departmental Examinations – May 2016. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Hemakarthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.R.Sureshkumar, Additional Government Pleader for R-1 Mr.V.Panneerselvam for R-2 to R-4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.