VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

V.Chockalingam, v. The Superintending Engineer,

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 November 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 7284/2016

Judgment

ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the electricity service connection has been granted to the house of the petitioner and therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. Index :

10.11.2023 NCC : Internet : ssb To

1.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Office of the Superintending Engineer, Dindigul-Trichy Bye-pass Road, Dindigul.

2.The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Office of the Executive Engineer, Oddanchathram Division, Oddanchathram Town.

3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Office of the Assistant Executive Engineer, Kannivadi Post,

4.The Assistant Engineer (Electrical), TANGEDCO, Office of the Assistant Engineer (Distribution), Moolachathram,

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb

10.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P(MD).No.6148 of 2016 V.Chockalingam .. Petitioner v. 1.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Office of the Superintending Engineer, Dindigul-Trichy Bye-pass Road, Dindigul. 2.The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Office of the Executive Engineer, Oddanchathram Division, Oddanchathram Town. 3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Office of the Assistant Executive Engineer, Kannivadi Post, 4.The Assistant Engineer (Electrical), TANGEDCO, Office of the Assistant Engineer (Distribution), Moolachathram, 5.Chinnakalai .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in Letter No.E.Mi.Po/Musam/Ko.Kattu/A.No.29/16 dated 08.02.2016 on the file of the fourth respondent and quash the same and further directing the respondents 1 to 4 to provide electricity connection bearing Door No.2/287-A (within the jurisdiction of Kamatchipuram Village Panchayat) bearing Survey No.578/7, Ramalingampatti, Kamatchipuram Village, Dindigul District. For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel for R1 to R4 Mr.A.L.Kannan for R5 *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.