Kanagaraj. A v. The Superintending Engineer

O R D E R Heard both sides.

¶2The petitioner challenges the impugned demand raised by the second respondent / Assistant Engineer (O&M) authority.

¶3The petitioner can very well raise dispute before the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum which is headed by the 3 W.P.(MD)NO.24875 OF 2022 first respondent. If the petitioner files a petition or appeal before the first respondent within four weeks from today the same will be disposed of on merits and in accordance with law without reference to limitation. This benefit will not available to the petitioner if the petitioner fails to move the said forum within the time stipulated above.

¶4Leaving open the petitioner's contentions, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

03.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU To: The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., (TANGEDCO), Electricity Board, Trichy Electricity Distribution Circle, Mannarpuram, Trichy – 621 020. 4 W.P.(MD)NO.24875 OF 2022 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.24875 of 2022

03.10.2023

1 W.P.(MD)NO.24875 OF 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.24875 of 2022 AND W.M.P.(MD)No.19040 of 2022 A.Kanagaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., (TANGEDCO), Electricity Board, Trichy Electricity Distribution Circle, Mannarpuram, Trichy – 621 020. 2. Irudhayaraj, Assistant Engineer (Operation and Maintenance), Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., (TANGEDCO), Valadi, Lalgudi Taluk, Trichy District. 3. Mohan, Employee of Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., (TANGEDCO), Valadi, Lalgudi Taluk, Trichy District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records pertaining to the 2 W.P.(MD)NO.24875 OF 2022 impugned order of the 2nd respondent dated 12.10.2022 in Ka.No. Vu.Mi.Po/ E.Ka/ Ela/ Va.Aa/ Ko. Kattu/ A.No. 0219/22-23 directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.14,393/- as electricity charges for the month of 07/2022 and 09/2022 in respect of Sc No. 062180 021794 and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to calculate the electricity charges as per proper meter reading and as per consumption of electricity by the petitioner during the relevant period. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For Respondents : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing counsel. * * *