- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 April 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 8085/2016
Judgment
ORDER When this writ petition is taken up for hearing on
06.04.2023 there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.
2.Accordingly this writ petition is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' today. Despite the same, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
24.04.2023 Internet : Yes / No dsk To
1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.
3.The Tahsildar, Thiruppuvanam, Sivagangai District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
24.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 24.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)Nos.6605 of 2016 S.Nagalingam Pillai ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 3.The Tahsildar, Thiruppuvanam, Sivagangai District. 4.S.Nagarajan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in Pa.Mu.B1/8074/2015 order passed on 10.10.2015 and signed on 02.11.2015 and quash the same. For Petitioner : No representation For Respondent : No representation
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.