- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 March 2023
- Bench
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 8817/2016
Judgment
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been rendered infructuous by subsequent events.
¶2By taking note of the same, W.P. (MD) No.8817 of 2016 is dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
28.03.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No PKN To
¶1The President, Kappiliyapatti Village Panchayat, Ottachathiram Taluk, Didigul District.
¶2Assistant Electricity Engineer, Viruppatchi Section, TANGEDCO, Ottanchatiram, Dindigul District.
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. PKN W.P.(MD)No.8817 of 2016
28.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :28.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.(MD)No.8817 of 2016 and W.M.P (MD) No. 7022 of 2016 M.Kannusamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The President, Kappiliyapatti Village Panchayat, Ottachathiram Taluk, Didigul District. 2. R.Kaliammal 3. Assistant Electricity Engineer, Viruppatchi Section, TANGEDCO, Ottanchatiram, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st Respondent in his proceedings Vu.Ma.A.Ka.No.09/2015-2016 dated 12.04.2016 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary. For Petitioner :Mr.R.Devaraj for Mr.D.Kirubakaran For Respondents :Mr.M.Rajarajan for R1 Mr.S.Deenadhayalan for R3 No appearance for R2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.