- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 25 August 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan, B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 8857/2016
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2The grievance of the writ petitioner is that while laying the road that is running parallely to the petition mentioned canal, the width of the canal had been substantially reduced. It is well settled that the dimensions of the water body will have to be maintained as such. The reduction in the dimensions cannot be allowed.
¶3The official respondents are directed to ensure that the canal is restored to the original position. In other words, the original width will have to be restored. This shall be done by the official respondents within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶4The Writ Petition is allowed on these terms. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[G.R.S., J.] [B.P., J.]
25.08.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No rmi To
1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J and
B.PUGALENDHI, J. rmi
2.The Assistant Director of Village Panchayat, Collectorate Campus,
3.The Block Development Officer, Kuranthancode Panchayat Union, Kuranthancode & Post,
4.The Panchayat Union Engineer, Kuranthancode Panchayat Union, Kuranthancode & Post,
5.The Executive Engineer, Kodayar Division, Water Resources Organisation, Public Works Department,
6.The Assistant Engineer, Irrigation Section, Water Resources Organisation, Public Works Department, Thuckalay, W.P(MD)No.8857 of 2016
25.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD)No.8857 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD)No.7056 of 2016 A.Vins Anto ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, 2.The Assistant Director of Village Panchayat, Collectorate Campus, 3.The Block Development Officer, Kuranthancode Panchayat Union, Kuranthancode & Post, 4.The Panchayat Union Engineer, Kuranthancode Panchayat Union, Kuranthancode & Post, 5.The Executive Engineer, Kodayar Division, Water Resources Organisation, Public Works Department, 6.The Assistant Engineer, Irrigation Section, Water Resources Organisation, Public Works Department, Thuckalay, 7.J.Joseph Benedict, Contractor, Kurunthancode Panchayat Union, Kurunthancode & Post, ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to restore the canal from Moolachanvilai to Kattukulam running through R.S.Nos.293/15, 294/8, 295/10, 296/2, 3 & 4, 355/6, 354/3, 2 &1 and 359/2 of Kurunthancode Village to its original position of 1 meter width. For Petitioners :Mr.C.T.Perumal For Respondents :Mr.K.Balasubramani, Special Government Pleader for R1 to R6 : Mr.M.Sridharan for R7
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.