- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 June 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 9016/2016
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner, with a grievance that the respondents 4 to 6 have constructed a house at D.No.73, Muniyandi Kovil Street, Jawaharpuram, K.Pudur, Madurai, without leaving any space to drain the rain water.
¶2There was no representation for the petitioner on 13.02.2023
20.06.2023. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. There is no representation for the respondents 4 to 6 also.
¶3The learned Standing Counsel, by relying on the counter affidavit filed by the first respondent, submits that the place of construction of houses by the respondents 4 to 6 at Door No.73, Muniyandi Kovil Street, K.Pudur, Madurai, is originally a Kanmai Poramboke belongs to the Thuyanenthai Kanmoi and the said land has been assigned to the Slum Clearance Board about 40 years back and the beneficiaries were allotted with the lands by the Slum Clearance Board. Since the houses belong to the respondents 4 to 6 come under the category of Government poramboke, the first respondent has not given any building plan approval for construction of houses. As of now, the respondents 4 to 6 have not carried out any construction activities in the disputed place.
¶4Recording the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent, this writ petition is closed. No costs.
22.06.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To
¶1The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Arignar Anna Nagar, Madurai District – 625 002.
¶2The City Welfare Officer, Madurai Corporation, Arignar Anna Nagar, Madurai District – 625 002.
¶3The Sub Inspector of Police, Tallakulam Police Station, Tallakulam, Madurai.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy
22.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI M.Saravanakumar ... Petitioner versus 1. The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Arignar Anna Nagar, Madurai District – 625 002. 2. The City Welfare Officer, Madurai Corporation, Arignar Anna Nagar, Madurai District – 625 002. 3. The Sub Inspector of Police, Tallakulam Police Station, Tallakulam, Madurai. 4. Arjunan 5. Sevugaperumal 6. Vijaya ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first and second respondents to take steps to prevent the 4th to 6th respondents from constructing a house structure at D.No.73, Muniyandi Kovil Street, Jawaharpuram, K.Pudur, Madurai, on the basis of the representation sent by the petitioner dated 28.03.2016. For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 : M/s.S.Devasena Standing Counsel For R2 and R3 : Mr.M.Sarangan Additional Government Pleader For R4 to R6 : No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.