K.Pandian, v. The Commissioner,

O R D E R At the hearing on 24.03.2023, it was recorded that there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was listed today under the caption for dismissal. Once again, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶2Therefore, W.P.(MD).No.9648 of 2016 is dismissed for non-prosecution without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.

(MD).Nos.7680 and 7681 of 2016 are closed.

31.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sbn To

1.The Commissioner Madurai Corporation, Madurai.

2.The Assistant Commissioner, IV Zone, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Nethaji Division, Madurai.

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai W.P.(Mi)No.9648oofo2016 SENTHILKUMARoRAMAMOORTHY,oJ. sbn W.P.(MD)No.9648oofo2016 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.7680o&o7681oofo2016

31.03.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :31.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.7680 & 7681 of 2016 K.Pandian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner Madurai Corporation, Madurai. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, IV Zone, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. 3.The Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Nethaji Division, Madurai. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 to 4 from interfering with the civil dispute pending before the civil Court of the petitioner with that of their lessor. For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader