VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M.Nadukani v. The Inspector of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 September 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 16985/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 21/09/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN M.Nadukani ... Petitioner/Accused Rank not known Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police (Crime), Gandhi Market Police Station, Trichy. Crime No.unknown of 2023. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.M.Dinesh Hari Sudarsan, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambiselvan, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.unknown of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 420 of IPC, in Crime No.unknown of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has not paid amount for the goods he purchased from the defacto complainant and threatened the defacto complainant as if the defacto complainant has committed theft of the petitioner's vehicle. Hence the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submitted that under force during the course of investigation in CSR No.340 of 2023, an amount of Rs.35,000/- was brought from the company of the petitioner through his employee and out of the amount Rs.25,000/- was paid to the complainant and Rs.10,000/- went missing in the police station. Over which, a complaint was also given by the petitioner to the higher authorities.

¶4Heard learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶5There shall be a direction to the Superintendent of Police, to conduct enquiry on the basis of the complaint given by this petitioner regarding the above said collection and missing of money and take further action in accordance with law. The petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate action to ventilate his grievances.

¶6With this direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. sd/- 21/09/2023 / TRUE COPY /

/10/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. pnn TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GANDHI MARKET POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. COPY TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TRICHY DISTRICT. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16985 of 2023 Date :21/09/2023 RS/DD/SAR-(16.10.2023) 3P 4C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.