Thangaraj, S/O.Periyannan, v. The Director,

ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner.

2.Perusal of the records show that in the earlier occasion it was reported before this Court that the learned Counsel on record passed away and therefore, this court by order dated 10.03.2023 ordered notice to the petitioner and it was served on the petitioner. The petitioner's name is also printed in the cause list. However, there is no representation for the petitioner.

3.This writ petition is pending from the year 2016 without any progress and since the petitioner is not showing any interest, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

21.04.2023 Internet : Yes / No dsk To

1.The Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Mankadusami Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai.

2.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli.

3.The Special Tahsildar (Cable TV), Tiruchirappalli.

4.The Sub Inspector of Police, Uppliyapuram, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk

21.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 21.04.2023 CORsAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Thangaraj ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Mankadusami Street, Nungambakkam, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli. 3.The Special Tahsildar (Cable TV), Tiruchirappalli. 4.The Sub Inspector of Police, Uppliyapuram, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District. 5.Selvam ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing 3rd and 4th respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 16.03.2013 and initiate appropriate action as against the 5th respondent under the Cable TV Network Regulation Act. For Petitioner : No representation For Respondent : Mr.I. David Sundar Singh Nos.1 & 4 For Respondent : Mr.M.Sarangan, Nos.2 and 3 Additional Government Pleader For Respondent : No representation No.5