- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 December 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 23074/2023
Judgment
O R D E R When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate submitted that survey was already conducted. But then, it is conceded by the respondents that survey sketch has not been given to the writ petitioners.
2.The respondents are directed to serve a copy of the survey report along with the survey sketch on the petitioners' counsel.
3.The writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. No costs.
21.12.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No mm To
1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.
2.The Tahsildar, Thiruverumbur Taluk, Trichy District.
3.The Head Surveyor, Thiruverumbur Taluk, Trichy District.
4.The Taluk Deputy Surveyor, Thiruverumbur Taluk, Trichy District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. mm W.P.(MD)No.23074 of 2023
21.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :21.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.23074 of 2023 1.P.Mohan 2.Kalaiyarasi 3.Rajeswari 4.Vengatesan ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy. 2.The Tahsildar, Thiruverumbur Taluk, Trichy District. 3.The Head Surveyor, Thiruverumbur Taluk, Trichy District. 4.The Taluk Deputy Surveyor, Thiruverumbur Taluk, Trichy District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to conduct Survey, Demarcate, Laying Survey Stone and issue a separate Patta to the petitioners property measuring an extent of 0.04.20 ars (10.45 cents) situated in Thuvakudi Village, Thiruverambur Taluk, Trichy District based on the Patta No.3852 issued by the 2nd respondent order vide D.K.No. 983/2022 to 986/2022 dated 11.11.2022 and also based on the petitioners representation dated 28.07.2022, 12.09.2022 within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioners : Mr.I.Velpradeep For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.