VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Shanmugam .A v. The Tahsildar

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 September 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 23062/2023

Judgment

O R D E R The petitioner with grievance that there are certain corrections has to be carried out in the patta has approached the Tahsildar and has filed this writ petition to consider his application dated

29.04.2023.

¶2The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the respondent is conducting the enquiry and he would conclude the enquiry as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶3Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate, this writ petition is closed. No costs.

NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No.

21.09.2023 Internet:Yes am To The Tahsildar, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. am

21.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI A.Shanmugam ... Petitioner Vs The Tahsildar, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. ...Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, direct the respondent to delete deceased Manickam name from Patta No.1408 in S.No.384/3 situated at Sempoothi Village, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukkottai District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 29.04.2023. For Petitioner :Mr.J.Anandkumar For Respondent :Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.