- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 December 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 20508/2018
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the tender Notification of the year 2018.
¶2When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submits that the tender was allotted to the third respondent in the year 2018 itself and the work was also completed.
¶4In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition.
¶5Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
01.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb To
1.The Additional Divisional Railway Manager, Madurai Division, Southern Railway, Madurai.
2.The Senior Divisional Mechanical Engineer, Madurai Division, Southern Railway, Divisional Office, Mechanical Branch, Madurai-625 016. W.P.(MD) No.20508 of 2018 Dated : 01.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.(MD) No.20508 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.18259 to 18261 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD).No.19999 of 2018 M/s. Premier Garment Processing, Rep., by its Proprietor, Mr.H.Ebrahim Sha, 29, Govindan Street, G.N.Chetty Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Additional Divisional Railway Manager, Madurai Division, Southern Railway, Madurai. 2.The Senior Divisional Mechanical Engineer, Madurai Division, Southern Railway, Divisional Office, Mechanical Branch, Madurai-625 016. 3.M/s.Tharu & Sons, Karipayi Road, Rajagiri Post, South Kalamassery, Ernakulam-683 104. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned tender notification issued by the 2nd respondent in Ref.No.Mech-MDU-15-18, dated 05.06.2018 and consequent letter of acceptance in Ref.No.U/M.35/Linen/Daily/Non-Daily dated 17.09.2018 issued by the 2nd respondent in favour of the 3rd respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents either to issue fresh tender notification or permit/allow the petitioner to provide "collection, machine washing, ironing, loading/unloading transportation and distribution of bed rolls to the passengers travelling in 2nd AC and 3rd AC coaches" till the commissioning of providing the service under the BOOT scheme by the petitioner. For Petitioner : No appearance For RR1 & 2 : Mr.K.R.Laxman
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.