- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 October 2023
- Bench
- V.Sivagnanam
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 17240/2023
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19/10/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.SIVAGNANAM Kompaiya ... Petitioner/Accused 7 in Crl.OP(MD).17240 of 2023 Ajith @ Poovarasan ... Petitioner/Accused 9 in Crl.OP(MD).17241 of 2023
Vs State through The Inspector of Police, A.Mukkulam Police Station, Virudhunagar District. (Crime No.19 of 2023) ... Respondent/Complainant in both Petitions IN BOTH PETITIONS: For Petitioner : Mr.S. SELVAKUMAR
Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.T.SENTHILKUMAR
Additional Public Prosecutor PETITIONS FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.19/2023 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners / Accused, who were arrested and remanded judicial custody on 20.02.2023 for the offences under Sections 8(c) r/w. 20(b) (ii) ©, 25, 27(A) and 29(1) of NDPS Act in Crime No.19 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners herein and other accused have illegaly found in possession of 26.235 kgs of Ganja. Hence the case.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that it is a second bail petition and the earlier petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed by this Court on 24.04.2023 in Crl.O.P(MD).Nos. 6608 and 6619 of 2023. He would further submit that only 2.050gm was recovered from A7 and no contraband was recovered from A9. He further contended that total contraband recovered only commercial quantity and seeks bail.
¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that it is a 2nd bail petition and the total contraband recovered is commercial quantity. He further contended that the petitioners herein are also having previous cases and the other accused have purchased the contraband from A9 and this fact was disclosed by the other accused persons and hence, strongly objected to grant bail petitioners.
¶5Considering the fact that the total contraband recovered from the petitioners and other accused are commercial quantity and also the petitioners herein are having previous cases and that there is no change of circumstances after dismissal of the earlier petitions, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.
¶6Accordingly, these Criminal Original Petitions are dismissed.
sd/-
19/10/2023
/ TRUE COPY /
/11/2023
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. )
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023. TRP TO 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI. 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, A.MUKKULAM POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. ORDER IN Date :19/10/2023 SA/DD/SAR. /21.11.2023/3P/4C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.