VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Rohini, v. The Tahsildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 September 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 23437/2023

Judgment

O R D E R The petitioner with a grievance that her application for survey of land has not been considered by the respondents has filed this writ petition.

2.Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia, learned Special Government Pleader who takes notice for the respondents submits that the petitioner's application for survey of her land would be considered on seniority basis and it would be completed within a reasonable time.

3.Considering the submission made by the learned Special Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Survey Officer to complete the survey as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

26.09.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes vrn To

1.The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.

2.The Land Surveyor, Karumathur Sub Division, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. vrn

26.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Rohini ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Tahsildar, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. 2.The Land Surveyor, Karumathur Sub Division, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 06.03.2023 and measure and demarcation of the land in north side of the S.No.56/2B1, for the extent of 0.25.00 hectare (50 cents) in Kalluthu Village, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balaji For Respondents : Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.