- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 29 November 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 24163/2019
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the tender notification of the year 2019.
¶2Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that pursuant to the impugned tender notification, the work has been executed and therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition.
¶3Recording the submission made by both sides, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
29.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb To
1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Engineer in Chief, Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai.
3.The Chief Engineer (Buildings), Madurai Region, Thallakulam, Madurai-625 002.
4.The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Buildings (Construction and Maintenance) Circle, Tirunelveli District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb Dated : 29.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P(MD).Nos.20755 and 20756 of 2019 A.Karuppasamy .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Engineer in Chief, Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai. 3.The Chief Engineer (Buildings), Madurai Region, Thallakulam, Madurai-625 002. 4.The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Buildings (Construction and Maintenance) Circle, Tirunelveli District. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the impugned notification issued by the fourth respondent in Tender Notice No:1/2019-2020/dated 25.10.2019 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, restrain the respondents from issuing Tender notifications under the Package System. For Petitioner : Mr.R.J.Karthick For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.