V.Jeyaraj v. The Superintendent of Police

O R D E R This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a direction to the respondent Police to initiate action on the basis of a complaint given by the petitioner, dated 04.09.2023.

¶2When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submits that basing on a complaint given by the petitioner, dated 04.09.2023, the respondent Police have conducted enquiry and they are going to register the case against the accused. It is also submitted that during the course of enquiry, the respondent Police have issued summons to the accused and he did not receive. The same is recorded.

¶3In view of the fact that the respondent Police have already initiated enquiry, no further directions can be given.

¶4Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

27.09.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

DR.D.NAGARJUN, J. tsg

27.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN V.Jeyaraj ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District. 3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to conduct enquiry and take appropriate action upon the petitioner's complaint, dated 04.09.2023 within a stipulated time period in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Senthil Murugan For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (Criminal Side)