The Divisional Managger, National Insurance Co.Ltd., v. Sunitha,

JUDGMENT ********* [Judgment of the Court was made by RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN.,J.] This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed againt the judgement and award made in M.C.O.P.No.118 of 2013, dated

03.03.2017, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate) Nagercoil and to set aside the judgment and award.

¶2Challenging the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.118 of 2013 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate) Nagercoil this appeal is filed on the point of contributory negligence and quantum.

¶3The factum of the accident and the manner of accident are not in dispute.

¶4The respondents 1 to 4, who are the claimants, filed the claim petition claiming compensation of Rs.20,00,000/- for the death of one Justin in the road transport accident on 28.01.2013.

¶5To substantiate the factum of the accident as well as the manner of the accident, the occurrence witness P.W.2 was entered into the witness box and has narrated the incident. Though the appellant / Insurance Company filed counter affidavit raising the plea of contributory negligence, they have not adduced any oral and documentary evidence. The Tribunal, accepted the evidence of P.W. 2 coupled with Ex.P1 – FIR and Ex.P8 – Charge sheet, has rightly come to the conclusion that the accident has taken place due to the rash and negligent driving by the driver of the vehicle insured with the appellant Insurance Company.

¶6The learned counsel for the appellant / Insurance Company draws our attention to the answer in the cross-examination of P.W.

¶2On a combined reading of the cross-examination of P.W.2 with chief-examination of P.W.1 and documentary evidence of Ex.P1 and Ex.P8, this Court comes to the conclusion that the finding of the Tribunal that the accident had taken place due to the rash and neligent driving of the driver of the vehicle insured with the appellant is well merited and well considered and the same does not require any interference. Accordingly, the said plea raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is hereby stands negatived.

¶7On the point of quantum of compensation, the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondents 1 to 5 are heard.

¶8The Tribunal, based upon the documentary evidence has come to the conclusion that the deceased was aged about 38 years and he was employed and earning Rs.7,500/- per month and following the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SARLA VERMA has fixed the future prospects at 50% and considering the number of dependants has deducted 1/4th, rightly applied the multiplier of 15 and hence, we do not find any excess of amount being awarded under the pecuniary loss to the deceased family.

¶9On the point of conventional head, wife / first claimant is entitled to Rs.40,000/- for consortium and the love and affection awarded for the respondents 2 & 3 are hereby confirmed. The loss of love and affection awarded to the respondents 4 & 5 is also confirmed and hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed only to the limited extent. The award passed by the tribunal in all other aspects are confirmed.

10.The award of the Tribunal is modified as follows: S. . Description Amount awarded by Tribunal Amount awarded

by this Court Award confirmed or modified or enhanced or granted

¶1Loss of income Rs.15,18,750 Rs.15,18,750 confirmed

¶2Loss

of Consortium to the

wife/1st claimant Rs.1,00,000 Rs.40,000 modified

¶3Loss of Love and affection to

the appellants claimants 2 & Rs. 1,00,000/- each (Rs. 2,00,000) Rs.2,00,000 confirmed

¶4Loss of love and affection to

the

4th claimant Rs.25,000 Rs.25,000 confirmed

¶5Loss of love and affection to

the

5th claimant Rs.50,000 Rs.50,000 confirmed

¶6For

Medical expenses Rs.40,000 Rs.40,000 confirmed

¶7For Transportation Rs.10,000 Rs.10,000 Confirmed

¶8For

funeral expenses Rs.25,000 Rs.25,000 Confirmed Total Rs.19,68,750 Rs. 19,08,750 reduced by Rs.60,000

¶11The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed reducing the compensation from Rs.19,68,750/-to Rs.19,08,750/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% p.a.from the date of claim petition till the date of realization. The fourth respondent/appellant Insurance Company is directed to deposit the modified enhanced award amount with proportionate accrued interest and costs, less the award amount already deposited, if any, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The first claimant is entitled to a sum of Rs.7,20,000/-, the 4th claimant is entitled to Rs.88,750/-, 5th claimant is entitled to Rs.1,00,000/-. On such deposit being made, the major claimants are entitled to withdraw their share amount along with proportionate accrued interest and cost, less the amount already withdrawn, if any by filing necessary application before the tribunal. The claimants 2 & 3 are entitled to Rs.5,00,000/- each. The Tribunal shall deposit the share of claimants 2 & 3, who are minor claimants,in a Fixed Deposit in any one of the Nationalised Bank, which shall be renewed periodically, till they attain majority. The first respondent/petitioner mother of the minors is permitted to withdraw the interest from the shares of her minor children, viz., claimants 2 & 3, once in three months from the bank directly. No costs.

Index:Yes/No [T.K.R.,J.] [P.B.B.,J.] Internet:Yes/No

19.10.2023 NCC:Yes/No am To The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate), Nagercoil. RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J. AND P.B.BALAJI,J. am

19.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI and C.M.P(MD)No.8121 of 2019 The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co., Ltd., Kallakathira Building, Main Road, Pattinam Thitta Post, Kerala State. ...Appellant/Respondent No.4 .vs. 1.Sunitha 2.Minor K.S.Maffin 3.Minor K.S.Taffin 4.Chellan 5.Chellamma (Minor respondents 2 & 3 are represented by their mother and guardian 1st petitioner) ...Respondents/Petitioners 6.Ratheesh 7.Shajahan 8.A.Nizaruddin ...Respondents/Respondents 1-3 PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the fair and decreetal order dated 03.03.2017 made in M.C.O.P.No.118 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate) Nagercoil. For Appellant :Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan For R1 to R5 :Mr.C.Kishore For R6 to R8 : No appearance