VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Balakumar, v. K.Vignesh

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 November 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
CONT P(MD) 2075/2023

Judgment

1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.2075 OF 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.15714 of 2023 AND CONT.P.(MD)No.2075 of 2023 IN W.P.(MD)No.3978 of 2023 W.P.(MD)No.15714 of 2023 P.Nehru ... Petitioner Vs.

¶1The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, Trichy District.

¶3The Tahsildar, Trichy District.

¶4The Deputy Surveyor, Trichy District.

¶5Balakumar ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to conclude the enquiry pending in his proceedings in Na.Ka.A1/7004/2022 based on the 2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.2075 OF 2023 representation sent by the petitioner dated 22.06.2023 within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ananda Kumar For R-1 to R-4 : Mr.S.Ra.Ramachandran, Additional Government Pleader. For R-5 : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar * * * CONT.P.(MD)No.2075 of 2023 Balakumar ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. Mr.K.Vignesh, Tahsildar, Trichy District. ... Contemnor / Respondent Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor / respondent for his willful and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court passed in W.P.(MD)No.3978 of 2023 dated

01.03.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar For Respondent : Mr.K.Balasubramani, Special Government Pleader. * * * 3 CONT.P.(MD)NO.2075 OF 2023 C O M M O N O R D E R Heard both sides.

¶2Thiru.Balakumar filed W.P.(MD)No.3978 of 2023 for conducting survey in respect of the petition-mentioned lands. The writ petition was disposed of on 01.03.2023 by issuing certain directions. Contending that the order passed by this Court has not been complied with, the present contempt petition came to be filed.

¶3The objector is one Nehru. He filed W.P.(MD) No.15714 of 2023 for directing the Tahsildar, Lalgudi to conclude the patta proceedings.

¶4When the matter was taken up together, the learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that the issue essentially pertains to UDR entry. Therefore, the District Revenue Officer, Trichy is the authority competent to decide the issue. Therefore, the Tahsildar, Lalgudi has forwarded all the relevant papers to the District Revenue Officer on

03.11.2023. 4 CONT.P.(MD)NO.2075 OF 2023

¶5The District Revenue Officer, Trichy shall hold an enquiry on 11.12.2023 at 3.00p.m. Neither Balakumar nor Nehru will receive any separate notices. It is open to the District Revenue Officer to issue notice to all interested parties if any. After holding enquiry, order on merits and in accordance with law will be passed within a period of three months thereafter. W.P.(MD)No.15714 of 2023 is disposed of. No costs. Cont.P.(MD)No.2075 of 2023 is closed.

06.11.2023 NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU 5 CONT.P.(MD)NO.2075 OF 2023 To:

¶1The District Collector, Trichy District, Trichy.

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, Trichy District.

¶3The Tahsildar, Trichy District.

¶4The Deputy Surveyor, Trichy District. 6oooooooooooooooooCONT.P.(MD)NO.2075oOFo2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.15714 of 2023 AND CONT.P.(MD)No.2075 of 2023 IN W.P.(MD)No.3978 of 2023

06.11.2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.