VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Rani v. The Commissioner of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 October 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 17503/2023

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents No.1 and 2 to instruct the respondent No.3 for not to harass the petitioner on the guise of enquiry.

¶2The petitioner is the owner of the property. On the basis of the complaint given by one Athirstarajan, frequent summons were issued to the petitioner that he is interfering into the civil issue.

¶3The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that even though the summon issued to the petitioner, he has not appeared before the third respondent so far.

¶4Let the petitioner appear before the third respondent and produce the documents showing ownership of the property. If it is found during the course of enquiry that it is the civil issue, the third respondent may close the above said complaint, advising the parties to workout their remedy through appropriate proceedings.

¶5With the above said direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

03.10.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : Indu TO

1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

3.The Inspector of Police, B-6, Jaihindpuram Police Station, Madurai.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

Indu Dated: 03.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.10.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN S.Rani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Inspector of Police, B-6, Jaihindpuram Police Station, Madurai. ...Respondent No.1-3 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondents No.1 and 2 to instruct the respondent No.3 for not to harass the petitioner on the guise of enquiry. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Murugesan For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, (Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.