- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 August 2026
- Bench
- S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
- Case no.
- WP Crl.(MD) 4436/2026
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition is filed seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner his labourers and the poultry farm situated in survey no.21/2, measuring an extent of 4 Acres and 96 cents at Vellore Village, Musiri Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District, based on the petitioner's complaints in CSR No.1040 of 2026 dated 01.08.2026, so as to enable the petitioner to carry on his lawful poultry farming activities as well as repairs and rectification work as required by the authorities and to take necessary steps to clear the alleged health hazards and comply with the directions issued by the competent authorities, without any obstruction or interference from third parties, within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court.
¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that despite the petitioner having availed necessary permission from the District Pollution Control Board, the construction of the poultry farm is being continuously obstructed by certain authorities who have a hidden agenda to grab money from the petitioner, pursuant to which the petitioner is not able to continue his construction in terms of the permission obtained from the pollution control board.
¶3The learned Government Advocate submitted that the complaint is received and CSR No.1040 of 2026 was issued on 01.08.2026 and enquiry is pending onthe complaint.
¶4Heard either sides and carefully perused the materials available on record.
¶5In view of the above submission, the respondent police is directed to put the petitioner as well as the proposed accused on notice under Section 64 of BNSS and thereafter conduct an enquiry and ensure the proper construction of the petitioner in terms of the order passed by the Pollution Control Board. The police is directed to afford necessary police protection on payment of necessary charges in terms of G.O(Ms)No.139, Home (Pol-VIII) Department, dated 04.03.2019.
¶6With the above direction, this Writ Petition is allowed.
06.08.2026 NCC : yes / no Index : yes / no pnn To
¶1The Superintendent of Police, Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli District.
¶2The Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, Tiruchirappalli District.
¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooL.oVICTORIAoGOWRI,oJ. pnn ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooORDER oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooIN oooooooooooooooooooooooooWPoCRL.(MD)oNo.4436oofo2026 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooDateoo:o06/08/2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 06/08/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI P. Ramprakash ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep By its, The Superintendent of Police, Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, Tiruchirappalli District. ... Respondents PRAYER :- To issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner his labourers and the poultry farm situated in survey no.21/2, measuring an extent of 4 Acres and 96 cents at Vellore Village, Musiri Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District, based on the petitioner's complaints in CSR No.1040 of 2026 dated 01.08.2026, so as to enable the petitioner to carry on his lawful poultry farming activities as well as repairs and rectification work as required by the authorities and to take necessary steps to clear the alleged health hazards and comply with the directions issued by the competent authorities, without any obstruction or interference from third parties, within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr. T. Eashwar, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.