Mohamed Ismail v. State Rep by Its

O R D E R This Writ Petition is filed seeking Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent based on his representation dated

22.09.2023.

¶2When the matter was called on 13.10.2023, learned counsel for the petitioner sought adjournment, but in the evening he has made a mention that some occurrence took place in the morning. On that account, the matter was adjourned to today(01.11.2023).

¶3Today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the fourth respondent submitted that in respect of the occurrence that took place on 13.10.2023, a case was registered in Crime No.669 of 2023 under Sections 147, 148, 447, 427, 379, 294(b), 506(2) of IPC against three known persons. Among the accused, this petitioner is also arrayed as first accused.

¶4In view of the registration of the FIR, the petitioner has to face the investigation. Since there is no representation for the petitioner, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs.

01.11.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No pnn To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Perumalpuram, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Melapalayam Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J pnn Dated 01.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.11.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Mohamed Ismail ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Perumalpuram, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Melapalayam Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 4.P.T.Abdul Sallam ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent based on his representation dated 22.09.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Maheswaran For Respondents : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi for R1 - R3 Government Advocate (Crl. Side) : Mr.H.Arumugam for R4