- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 29 September 2023
- Bench
- S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 23898/2023
Judgment
ORDER The present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the second respondent herein to settle the retirement benefits viz., Gratuity, EL encashment and PF to the petitioner along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of retirement till the date of actual payment.
¶2By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.
¶3The petitioner joined the services of the second respondent as Junior Engineer on 17.02.1984. While so, due to his health condition, the petitioner sought for voluntary retirement. His request for voluntary retirement was considered by the Board of Directors of the second respondent Corporation and a resolution was also passed on 23.11.2021, sanctioning the voluntary retirement. Thereafter, the second respondent vide proceedings, dated
22.12.2021 sanctioned the payment of the service Gratuity and also Earned Leave Encashment of the petitioner. The petitioner's pension was also sanctioned by the TNSTC Employees' Pension Fund Trust on 28.06.2022 with effect from 01.12.2021. The petitioner was allowed to retire on 30.11.2021. However, the petitioner's retirement benefits, namely, Gratuity, Provident Fund and Earned Leave Encashment are yet to be paid. Though the petitioner retired on 30.11.2021 and the second respondent himself sanctioned the payment of Gratuity and Earned Leave Salary on 22.12.2022 and the pension is being paid from 01.12.2021, other retirement benefits, namely, Gratuity, Earned Leave Salary and Provident Fund are yet to be paid. In view of the same, the petitioner had made several representations and the last of which was on 05.08.2023 and
25.08.2023. However, the same was not considered. Hence, this writ petition came to be filed.
¶4It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon the respondents to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other, instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. As such, non-consideration of the representation by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of Constitution of India and direct them to consider the same within a stipulated time.
¶5In view of the limited relief sought for by the petitioner in this case, this Court hereby direct the second respondent to settle the retirement benefits, namely, Gratuity, Earned Leave Encashment and Provident Fund to the petitioner along with 6% interest from the date of retirement till the date of actual payment considering his representations, dated 05.08.2023 and
25.08.2023, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶6This writ petition stands allowed, accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
29.09.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR To
1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Division, Corporate Office, Vannarapettai, Tirunelveli-627 011.
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
BTR
29.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI T.Manickam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Division, Corporate Office, Vannarapettai, Tirunelveli-627 011. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent herein to settle the retirement benefits viz., Gratuity EL encashment and PF to the petitioner along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of retirement till the date of actual payment. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Siva Raman For R-1 : Mr.N.Muthuvijayan Special Government Pleader For R-2 : Mr.K.Ramaiah Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.