Sathyaprakash. S v. The District Collector

O R D E R Heard both sides.

¶2The respondents had issued acquisition notice under the Tamil Nadu Act 31 of 1978. The petitioner has given his objections. The respondents have to necessarily consider the same before issuing final notification. The respondents are directed to adhere to due process of law. This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs.

01.11.2023 NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU To:

¶1The District Collector, District Collector Office, Trichy District.

¶2The Competent Authority and Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Thuraiyur, Trichy District. 3 W.P.(MD)NO.24737 OF 2023 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. PMU W.P.(MD)No.24737 of 2023

01.11.2023

1 W.P.(MD)NO.24737 OF 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.24737 of 2023 S.Sathyaprakash ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, District Collector Office, Trichy District. 2. The Competent Authority and Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Thuraiyur, Trichy District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and explanation dated 17.04.2023 and 26.04.2023 and pass order on merits and in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Susikumar For Respondents: Mr.K.Balasubramani, Special Government Pleader. * * * 2 W.P.(MD)NO.24737 OF 2023