Chinnaraj v. The Superintendent of Police

O R D E R This writ petitioner filed this Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to not to interfere in the civil dispute existed between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent based on the petitioners representation dated 22.09.2023.

¶2Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the respondents.

3.Heard both sides.

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by the third respondent, the petitioner was summoned to appear before the second respondent for enquiry. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is purely a civil dispute over which a suit is pending in O.S.No.64 of 2010. There was also decreed in favour of this petitioner against which appeal has also preferred and a petition under Section 47 of C.P.C., has been filed by the third respondent, which is stated to have pending before the District Munsif Court, Theni. Pending the proceedings, now the petitioner has been summoned to appear.

¶5Learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the parties have been advised to work out their remedy in the civil suit stated to be pending and the complaint was closed.

¶6Nothing survives for further adjudication in this case. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. No costs.

03.10.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No pnn G.ILANGOVAN, J pnn To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch II, Theni. Dated : 03.10.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.10.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Chinnaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Theni District, Theni. 2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch II, Theni. 3.Renganayaki ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to not to interfere in the civil dispute existed between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent based on the petitioners representation dated 22.09.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Saravanakumar For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor