- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 4 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 24096/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondents. Considering the nature of relief to be granted, issuance of notice to the private respondent is dispensed with.
¶2The fifth respondent herein filed W.P(MD)No.18111 of 2023 for conducting survey of the property mentioned therein. The writ petition was disposed of on 27.07.2023 in the following terms: "4.Recording the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Pleader that the application of the petitioner is under process, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to conduct an enquiry as per Section 10(1) of the Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 and thereafter proceed with the survey depending upon the outcome of the enquiry. Such exercise shall be concluded within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs." Pursuant to the said direction, the survey officials issued notice to the petitioner herein. To forbear the authorities from conducting survey, the present writ petition came to be filed.
¶3The present writ petition is not maintainable for two reasons. The impugned survey is proposed to be conducted only pursuant to the direction of this Court. It is true that the petitioner was not heard before direction was issued in the earlier writ petition. But then the petitioner cannot claim that he has been prejudiced. The order dated 27.07.2023 protects the rights of the petitioner. It clearly states that the petitioner herein will have to be heard. It has not peremptorily ordered conducting of survey. It states that survey will be conducted based on the outcome of the enquiry to which the petitioner will be a party.
¶4In any event to take care of the petitioner's interest, I add one more direction. The fourth respondent will pass a speaking order by considering the petitioner's objections. Copy of the same will be served on the petitioner. Survey will not be conducted immediately thereafter. Six weeks breathing time will be given so as to enable the petitioner to challenge if any adverse order is passed. If the petitioner's objections are sustained, the survey will be dropped and the petitioner will not have any cause of action to complain.
¶5With this direction to the fourth respondent, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
04.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA Note: Issue order copy on 05.10.2023.
To
1.The District Collector, Office of the Colletorate Building, Sivagangai District.
2.The District Revenue Office, Office of the District Revenue, Colletorate Building, Sivagangai District.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional, Colletorate Building, Sivagangai District.
4.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)No.20268 of 2023
04.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.20268 of 2023 Shanmugam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Office of the Colletorate Building, Sivagangai District. 2.The District Revenue Office, Office of the District Revenue, Colletorate Building, Sivagangai District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional, Colletorate Building, Sivagangai District. 4.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Manamadurai, Sivagangai District. 5.Sivakumar ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 to 4 to survey the land in connection with Survey No. 292/16, to an extent of 1 1/4 cents situated at Vellikurichi, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District based on the connected issues pending before the District Munsif, Manamadurai in O.S.No.20 of 2023. For Petitioner : Mr.D.S.Haroon Rasheed For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate for R.1 to R.4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.