VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Canara Bank v. Rajalakshmi

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 June 2023
Bench
P.Vadamalaiauthor
Case no.
CRP(MD) 2169/2017

Judgment

ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed to setaside the fair and decreetal order passed by the Additional Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam in I.A.No.7 of 2015 in O.S.No.14 of 2013 dated

14.12.2016.

¶2When the revision was taken up for hearing on 13.06.2023, there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore, the case was directed to be listed today (23.06.2023) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

23.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No vsd To

1.The Additional Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam.

2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

P.VADAMALAI, J. vsd

23.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI The Canara Bank, Kumbakonam Main Branch represented by its Branch Manager, T.S.R.Big Bazaar Street, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Rajalakshmi 2.Veeramani ... Respondents PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, to setaside the fair and decreetal order passed by the Additional Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam in I.A.No.7 of 2015 in O.S.No.14 of 2013 dated 14.12.2016. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : No Appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.