Murugan, v. Balakrishnan,

O R D E R This Court vide order dated 21.12.2021 has recorded that the sole petitioner has died and therefore adjourned the matter to 28.01.2022 for impleading the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner. When the matter was again listed on 28.01.2022, a further time was granted till 23.02.2022. Further, the matter was adjourned to 14.03.2022. But, for the reasons best known to the learned counsel for the petitioner, no steps have been taken.

¶2Meanwhile, the learned counsel for the petitioner withdrew his vakalt which was filed on behalf of the petitioner. Since the petitioner has already died, there is no purpose for issuing notice to the deceased petitioner.

¶3Having considered the above factual position and upon 'no instruction' reported by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Page No. 2 of 4 Revision Petition is dismissed as abated. No cost. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

22.09.2023 Internet : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No jen To The District Munsif, Srivaikundam. Page No. 3 of 4 C.R.P.(Mi)oNo.2290oofo2017 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. jen C.R.P.(MD)oNo.2290oofo2017 andoC.M.P.(MD)oNo.11110oofo2017

22.09.2023 PageoNo.o4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.09.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and C.M.P.(MD) No.11110 of 2017 Murugan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Balakrishnan 2.Ponpappa 3.Ramaiah Nadar 4.Mallika 5.Pachaiperumal 6.Raja 7.Siva 8.Ponnammal 9.Rani Ponnammal ... Respondents Prayer:- This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 03.10.2017 Page No. 1 of 4 passed by the learned District Munsif, Srivaikundam in I.A.No.522 of 2017 in O.S.No.9 of 2014. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mani Anandh For Respondents : No appearance ****