Ganesan v. The Assistant Engineer

ORDER Heard both sides.

2.The petitioner seeks electricity service connection for his residential premises. On the ground that no objection certificate has not been obtained from the revenue authorities, the impugned rejection order came to be passed.

3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that if the petitioner approaches the second respondent, no objection certificate will be duly issued. The petitioner can resubmit his application along with no objection certificate to be issued by the second respondent. Thereupon, the first respondent shall give electricity service connection to the petitioner subject to fulfilment of other usual formalities.

4.This writ petition is allowed on these terms. No costs.

16.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:- The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias

16.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO, Kallal, Sivagangai District. 2.The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent vide his proceedings in Ka.No.U.Mi.Po./Pa/Maravamangalam/Ko.Kattu/A.No.057/23 dated 05.06.2023 and quash the same as illegal and direct the 1st respondent to provide the electricity connection for the House property of the petitioner in Survey No.151/7 in Keelapoongodi Village and Panchayat, Kallal Union, Karaikudi Taluk in Sivagangai District. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.S.RA.Ramachandran, Addl. Government Pleader for R2. Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel for R1.