Alagarsamy Chettiar v. Malliga

JUDGMENT In an earlier occasion, there was no representation on the side of the Appellants. Since the Appellants have not represented either by Counsel or by themselves to prosecute the matter, this case was posted today (i.e. 29.11.2023) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today also the Appellants are not represented by their Counsel and they are not present in person, which shows that the Appellants are not interested in prosecuting the Appeal.

¶2Hence, the Second Appal is dismissed for non prosecution. No Costs. Index : Yes / No

29.11.2023 Internet : Yes

KSA To

¶1The District Court, Sivagangai.

¶2The Subordinate Court, Sivagangai.

¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.SRIMATHY, J KSA S.A(MD)No. 441 of 2017

29.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY S.A(MD)No. 441 of 2017 1. Alagarsamy Chettiar 2. Sivakumar 3. Pandiarajan 4. Alagu Soundaram 5. Nirmala Devi 6. Palanichelvan 7. Manickam ... Appellants Vs. Malliga ... Respondent PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the Decree and Judgment passed in A.S.No.09 of 2016 on the file of the District Judge, Sivagangai, dated 27.02.2017 confirming the Judgment and Decree made in O.S.No.91 of 2010, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Sivagangai, dated 03.03.2016. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan