VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Prabu v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep by

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 August 2026
Bench
K.Murali Shankarauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 17090/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K.Murali Shankar

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20/08/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Prabu, S/o.Nallu Thevar, East Street, Meenatchi Compound, Sourastra School Backside, Thumatti Reng Asamy Iyyeh Lane, Maduari.. ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep By, The Inspector of Police, Sempatti Police Station, Dindigul District. (Crime No.825 of 2021). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karunanithi, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar, Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- C-32.to enlarge the petitioner/A1 on bail in C.C.No.1063 of 2022 on the file of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Communal Clash Cases Court, Madurai, in connection with FIR in Crime No.825 of 2021 on the file of the respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.1, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.07.2026 for the offences punishable under Section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act, in C.C.No.1063 of 2022 on the file of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Communal Clash Cases Court, Madurai, in connection with FIR in Crime No.825 of 2021 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks bail.

2.It is not in dispute that since the petitioner has not turned up for the hearing on 27.04.2026, NBW was ordered to be issued and the same was executed and the petitioner was arrested on 22.07.2026 and he is still in judicial custody.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the petitioner has not turned up for the hearing on 27.04.2026, NBW came to be issued and the same was executed and the petitioner was arrested on 22.07.2026 and he is still in judicial custody. He would further submit that the NBW was issued against him for the second time. Hence, he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Counsel for State of TN (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police would submit that the case in C.C.No.1063 of 2022 on the file of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Communal Clash Cases Court, Madurai, is pending trial. He would further submit that the petitioner is involved in one previous case in small quantity. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances and also the facts that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 22.07.2026; that NBW was issued against the petitioner for the second time and that the case in C.C.No.1063 of 2022 is pending trial, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Communal Clash Cases Court, Madurai, and on further conditions that;

(a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the learned District and Sessions Judge, Communal Clash Cases Court, Madurai daily at 10.30 a.m., on all working days, until further orders;

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f)if the accused / petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

(K M S J)

20.08.2026 VSG TO

1.The learned District and Sessions Judge, Communal Clash Cases Court, Madurai.

2.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Madurai.

3.The Inspector of Police, Sempatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

¶4The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. K.MURALI SHANKAR,J., vsg ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17090 of 2026 Date : 20/08/2026

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.