VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Mahalakshmi v. The Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 November 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 18142/2023

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition filed to direct the Respondents to further investigate the Crime No.320 of 2023 on the file of the 2nd Respondent and find out the missing person namely Vinoth Jeyabal, S/o. Panneerselvam, age 43 years within the stipulated time.

¶2Learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that during the course of investigation, the accused namely Vinoth Jeyabal, has been secured and the First Information Report was closed as further action dropped. Therefore, this matter has become infructuous.

¶3In view of the submission, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

15.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : pnn To

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o. Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Rajapalayam North Police Station, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

pnn

15.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Mahalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Rajapalayam North Police Station, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the Respondents to further investigate the Crime No.320 of 2023 on the file of the 2nd Respondent and find out the missing person namely Vinoth Jeyabal, S/o. Panneerselvam, age 43 years within the stipulated time. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Krishnan For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.