VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Mariyasoosai v. The Sub Inspector of Police

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 October 2023
Bench
V.Sivagnanamauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 17722/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 05/10/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.SIVAGNANAM Mariyasoosai, ... Petitioner/Sole Accused

Vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Karaikudi North Police Station, Sivagangai District. (Crime No.279/2023). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : J.ANANDKUMAR, Advocate. For Respondent : M/S.M. AASHA, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Intervenor : Mr.ANANTH C.RAJESH, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :-For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.279/2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

The petitioner/ Accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 IPC in Crime No.279 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that one Swaminathan met with financial crisis and that the defacto complainant was said to have requested to settle his debts and that the said Swaminathan deposited his title deeds before the accused / petitioner herein and that the pursuant to the said request, the defacto complainant paid intersect to the petitioner herein towards Swaminathan's debt and that the petitioner executed the sale deeds in favour of the defacto complainant. However, the petitioner herein demanded further sum of Rs.2.50 Crore from the defacto complainant. When the same was questioned, the accused threatened the petitioner with dire consequences. Hence the case.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and his name has been falsely implicated in this case and hence, prayed for anticipatory bail.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that there was a civil dispute between the parties with regard the execution of the sale deed and that the petitioner has threatened the defefacto complainant and the investigation of the case is pending.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that it is a case of civil dispute, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as well as the trial Court on receipt of summons. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/-

05/10/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

/10/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. )

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. TRP TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARAIKUDI. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARAIKUDI NORTH POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/s.J.ANANDKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-14678[I] dated 05/10/2023 ) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.17722 of 2023 Date :05/10/2023 SA/DD/SAR. /10.10.2023/5P/6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.