- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 9 October 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 17909/2023
Judgment
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed, invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking orders directing the 2nd respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute of the 1st petitioner and the 3rd respondent and not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry.
¶2The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the third respondent herein, enquiry was undertaken. This is the second complaint given by the third respondent against the petitioners.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that there is civil dispute and some sale transaction issue between the petitioner and the third respondent herein.
¶4Even though it is the issue with regard to the sale transaction, which is civil in nature, in respect of other allegations, enquiry must be undertaken by the second respondent.
¶5For the limited purpose, the petitioner may appear before the second respondent Police. During the course of enquiry, if any trouble arises, the petitioner can workout his remedy through appropriate proceedings.
¶6With the above directions and liberty, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.
09.10.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : Indu To
¶1The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City, Tirunelveli.
¶2The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Tirunelveli City.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN
,J.
Indu Dated:09.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN 1. Reslin Raj 2. Santhana Raja ... Petitioners Vs. 1. The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City, Tirunelveli. 2. The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Tirunelveli City. 3. Kalaiselvi ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, directing the 2nd respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute of the 1st petitioner and the 3rd respondent and not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry. For Petitioners : Mr.Lenin Kumar.T For R1 and R2 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side).
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.